Steps in the Michigan Criminal Process

STEPS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS IN MICHIGAN

When a person is accused of committing a crime, the state of Michigan has a felony criminal process that must be followed. Michigan criminal defense attorneys are experienced in all phases of the criminal process and may be able to assist you in navigating these complex procedures.

INVESTIGATION AND FILING OF THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

When a crime has been committed, an investigation is conducted by the law enforcement having jurisdiction over the geographical area where the crime occurred. After the investigation is completed, the officer in charge of the case will bring all evidence to the Prosecuting Attorney for approval for filing of the criminal complaint.

WARRANT REVIEW

In this part of the process, the prosecuting attorney reviews the law enforcement agency’s investigation and evidence and will decide if there is enough legally admissible evidence to authorize a warrant for the defendant’s arrest. It there is indeed enough evidence, a warrant can be issued for arrest of the defendant. If there is insufficient admissible evidence, a warrant may be denied outright or the investigating officer may be ordered to conduct further investigation pending reevaluation of the case.

WARRANT ISSUE

If a warrant is authorized, the officer in charge takes it to the district court judge having jurisdiction over the case and a probable cause hearing will be held. During the hearing, the judicial magistrate will determine whether there is sufficient cause to sign and issue the warrant. If the defendant is already in custody, he or she will be brought before the magistrate for arraignment.

ARRAIGNMENT

During an arraignment, the charges against the defendant are read to him/her. At this time, the defendant has the opportunity to enter a plea to the charges listed on the warrant and is advised of the right to an attorney, a jury trial and a pretrial examination. The judge will then set bail to ensure that the defendant will appear in court. For a circuit court felony or misdemeanor, a preliminary examination will be scheduled within fourteen days of the date of arraignment.

PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION

The first adversarial hearing before the district is called the preliminary examination. At this time the defendant is represented by legal counsel if desired and the prosecutor is required to submit sufficient evidence to show a crime was committed and there is probable cause to believe it was committed by the defendant. The defense will be allowed to cross examine the prosecution’s witnesses and to call their own witnesses and submit evidence on behalf of the defendant. After submission of all evidence, the magistrate may do one of three things. He may find that a crime has been committed and that there is sufficient cause to believe the defendant committed the crime. The case would then be sent to the circuit level for arraignment. Second, the magistrate may dismiss the charges if there is insufficient evidence that a crime was committed and/or the insufficient evidence that it was committed by the defendant. Lastly, if the magistrate determines that the crime as listed in the complaint is not sufficiently proven but rather that a lesser offense was committed by the defendant, then the judge will bind the defendant over for arraignment and trial on the lesser crime.

CIRCUIT COURT ARRAIGNMENT

When a case reaches the circuit court, the charges are read to the defendant and he or she can enter a plea. If the defendant stands must or pleads not guilty, the case is either put on the trial docket or scheduled for a pretrial. Though defendants rarely plead guilty at this point, if he or she does so, a sentencing date will be scheduled and a presentencing investigation ordered.

PRETRIAL NEGOTIATIONS

During this phase of the process, the defense may bring any of a number of motions to trial. Motion to Quash is when the defendant alleges that the district court judge “abused his discretion” in binding the defendant over for trial and therefore asks that the charges and case be dismissed. The defense may also allege that evidence obtained during the investigation was in violation of the defendant’s civil rights and ask the court to suppress the evidence and not allow it at the trial. In a Walker Hearing, an allegation is made that the defendant’s confession was coerced or made in a way that violated his/her constitutional rights and should therefore not be allowed at the trial.

TRIAL

The trial follows all motions and pre-trials and has several different stages. A trial can be conducted before a jury or a judge without a jury.

VOIR DIRE

This first stage involves selection of jury members. The judge and attorneys for both sides must be present and can ask prospective jurors questions to determine whether they are qualified and also unprejudiced and unbiased. Twelve jurors and two alternates are chosen and sworn in.

OPENING STATEMENTS AND PROOFS

Once jury selection is completed, prosecution and defense can make opening statements presenting a general outline of the case and their evidence. The burden of proof falls on the prosecution so they present their case first. The defendant must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and the defense is not required to submit evidence or witnesses. However, if the defense does choose to present a defense, the prosecution may respond with rebuttal evidence, additional evidence intended to disprove evidence presented by the defense.

CLOSING ARGUMENTS, INSTRUCTION, AND DELIBERATION

Since the prosecution carries the burden of proof, they will present their closing argument first. After this, the defense may present its own closing argument, to which the prosecution may respond with a final rebuttal argument to the jury. Once all arguments are completed, the jury will be instructed on how they are to apply the law in their deliberations; they will then retire to deliberate on all evidence presented. The jury will return to court with a verdict which must be unanimous with all jury members in agreement. If they have found the defendant not guilty, the case is dismissed and the defendant is discharged. However, if the defendant is found guilty, he/she is entitled to appeal the verdict.

APPEAL

A defendant is sentenced following conviction of the crime. After this sentencing, he or she is entitled to appeal to an appellate court. In Michigan, you have an “appeal of right” to the Michigan Court of Appeals. This means that following a trial, the Court of Appeals must consider your case. If you were convicted by a plea, the Court of Appeals has discretion to hear your case but is not obligated to do so.

Our Michigan criminal defense attorneys are experienced in all phases of felony criminal proceedings and may be able to assist you in avoiding or reducing potentially serious consequences of finding yourself the defendant in a felony criminal trial. To discuss your situation, please fill out the contact form or call us at (616) 773-2945.

Posted on Google Google
Rachel Kelley profile picture
Rachel Kelley
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Josh and Blanchard Law did an amazing job representing my husband. He really went above and beyond and we couldn't be happier with the outcome. Thank you Josh!!
Posted on Google Google
Shanda Hopkins profile picture
Shanda Hopkins
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had Melissa Freeman as my lawyer and all I can say is that she is absolutely phenomenal! She is a great lawyer! She is also always available and willing to answer any questions or concerns you may have. She is caring, kind and just an exceptional human being. She always made sure to explain things and made sure I understood what direction our case was going and was great at keeping me calm because our case, as with any case, was very stressful for our family. I couldn't have asked for a better lawyer. She saved my life in a sense and I will remain forever grateful for her.
Posted on Google Google
David Head profile picture
David Head
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Keeley is an outstanding attorney. Trustworthy and competent.
Posted on Google Google
Karen Boer profile picture
Karen Boer
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
If you need a great lawyer this is the place.
Posted on Google Google
D Mc profile picture
D Mc
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Keely and the team were great!